|
|
|||||
|
![]() ![]() |
Rods of Ra - Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Are there
other Egyptian Rods being sold? Q: Once
purchased, can the Rods be returned? Q: I have seen
other companies who market Egyptian Cylinders or Wands who also sell
magnetic insoles for shoes and copper patches. What about these? Q: What is the
difference between the "Rods of Ra and other rods or wands being
marketed?
Q: What
historical documentation exists regarding the use of these Rods
throughout history? Q: Other
distributors of Egyptian Rods or Wands have said that for the Rods
or Wands to be effective, they must be "charged" or "energized" in a
pyramid. Is this true? This tactic may be used by unethical marketers to convince a prospective customer that their product is magically "charged" in a pyramid using a secret proprietary process. When pressed for facts or historical documentation, you will find that none exist. The Rods of Ra operate primarily by the galvanic skin response of the body interacting with the dis-similar metal Rods and their respective fillings, which appears to effect the blood, nervous system, and energetic body in a positive and beneficial way. Q: Did the
ancients really have advanced technology and knowledge of
electricity and its effect on the body? In history class, they
taught us that ancient Egypt was all about Temples and making bread!
This amazing artifact clearly indicates that Count Alassandro Volta DID NOT invent the battery in the 1800's, as we have been told. The Baghdad Battery even contained traces of 60/40 solder as is commonly used in electronics today! The most tantalizing question is, if the Sumarians were constructing batteries in 250 B.C., what were they using them for? You can read more about the Baghdad Battery HERE. Also, here is the very controversial relief located in the Ancient Egyptian Holy City of Abydos:
When this photograph, known as the "Abydos Helicopter", first came to light a number of years ago, it was immediately debunked by scholars who claimed it had been digitally altered and that no such relief actually existed. The problem was, those scholarly debunking skeptics should have actually visited the temple and looked for themselves. It turns out that the "Abydos Helicopter" relief is very real and has been repeatedly photographed. Another visitor took this photograph:
And yet another visitor took this with his video camera:
While this is not conclusive proof that the ancient Egyptians possessed helicopters, aircraft or submarines, it does however reveal that there is more to the story than we have been told. The important point here is that traditional scholars, when confronted with factual data which did not fit their "Ancient Egyptian Paradigm" of bread making, were unable to see the data as it actually was, and dismissed it as a digitally altered fraud, which turned out NOT to be the case. This is a classic example of "Paradigm Paralysis" as defined by futurist Joel Barker. The bottom line is, when we are asked about the opinions of "experts" or "scholars" regarding these alternative and cutting edge technologies that are out on the borderlands and frontiers of human thought, our answer is: "We don't give a rip!" The people who say something can't be done should get out of the way of those who are already doing it. Yet another curiosity: does the Tulli Papyrus offer proof of UFOs? For those unfamiliar with the Tulli papyrus, this is reputedly an ancient text dating back to the reign of Thutmose III that disappeared after the death of its owner, Alberto Tulli, the former director of the Egyptian section of the Vatican museum. A second story which may be closer to the truth recounts how Tulli and his brother, Monsignor Augusto Tulli, discovered the papyrus in a Cairo antique shop in 1934. Because of its high price tag, Professor Tulli could not afford to purchase the papyrus, but the owner of the shop allowed him to copy the text which was then transcribed from hieratic to hieroglyphics with the help of the Director of the Cairo Museum, Abbot E. Drioton. Since then it has established itself as the Holy Grail of Ufology. The reason for the huge amount of interest in the text is that the Tulli papyrus is often cited as evidence of UFOs appearing in Egypt around 3,000 years ago. A translation of the text was made by Boris de Rachewiltz, who is probably best known as the author of ‘An Introduction to Egyptian Art’ and ‘Maxims of the Ancient Egyptians’ - a collaborative effort with Guy Davenport. Rachewiltz’s translation has been widely circulated for years and greeted with equal amounts of cynicism and excitement. What can be said without a shadow of a doubt is that he had the knowledge to undertake the translation, being not only a respected translator of Egyptian texts, but an authority on Greek texts and African Art as well. Boris de Rachewiltz’s credentials appear to be far more impressive than some sceptics would have people believe. In fact, he authored several specialised publications that are still used by universities today. Without the actual Tulli papyrus itself being rediscovered, it is impossible to verify the accuracy of the translation or the claims made regarding the strange aerial phenomena it records. But there is enough circumstantial evidence to keep the papyrus in the public eye, as at least one person, author R. Cedric Leonard, claims to have uncovered a copy of the original text. When Egyptologists work on translating ancient texts, it is common practice to copy the document by hand before they commence their work to avoid unnecessary contact with the often fragile papyri. There would be a good chance that any translator working on the original would have taken a copy of the papyrus as standard practice before undertaking the work. Of course, as we’ve already mentioned, it is quite possible that Tulli himself only ever had a copy. It is one such copy that Leonard claims to have found in a U.S. library. According to many Egyptologists, judging by the style of the language and grammar it uses, the papyrus is either genuine, or has been forged by someone very knowledgeable in hieratic script and vocabulary. The Tulli text also exhibits numerous parallels to other documents of the Thutmoses III era. It would require a considerable amount of skill on the part of the hoaxer to replicate the language and writing style with such precision. Whether it is a clever hoax or a genuine text, no one can say for sure. Accusatory fingers have inevitably been pointed at Rachewiltz but why would he risk his academic reputation in such a way? If the working copy R.C. Leonard found is what it purports to be, then it certainly lends a huge amount of credence to the authenticity of the Tulli legend and de Racewiltz’s translation.
One of the reasons the Tulli papyrus is so controversial and what makes it so remarkable is that it records a strange aerial phenomena that occurred around 1000BC. Ufologists often cite this as documented proof of a UFO sighting and the translations below certainly make interesting reading. "In the year 22, in the third month of winter, in the sixth hour of the day, the scribes of the House of Life noticed a circle of fire that was coming from the sky [...] From the mouth it emitted a foul breath. It had no head. Its body was one rod long and one rod wide.¹ It had no voice. And from that the hearts of the scribes became confused and they threw themselves down on their bellies [...] then they reported the thing to the Pharaoh [...] His Majesty ordered [...] has been examined [...] and he was meditating on what had happened, that it was recorded in the scrolls of the House of the Life. Now after some days had passed, these things became more and more numerous in the skies. Their splendour exceeded that of the sun and extended to the limits of the four angles of the sky [...] High and wide in the sky was the position from which these fire circles came and went. The army of the Pharaoh looked on with him in their midst. It was after supper. Then these fire circles ascended higher into the sky and they headed toward the south. Fish and birds then fell from the sky. A marvel never before known since the foundation of their land [...] And Pharaoh caused incense to be brought to make peace with Earth² [...] and what happened was ordered to be written in the Annals of the House of Life so that it be remembered for all time forward." Notes: 1. One rod, or "rod of cord," equals 100 cubits. (or approximately 46 metres) 2. I.e., the altar sacred to Amon-Ra. Q: Can the
Rods of Ra be used anywhere? DISCLAIMER: All information on
this web site is provided for historical, educational, research, and
informational purposes only and is not intended to be construed as
health or medical advice nor are we intending to practice medicine
or lead anyone away from a doctor. We make absolutely no claims of
any treatment or cure for any disease. No suitability, claims, or
merchantability for any purpose is stated or implied. The Rods of Ra
are reproductions of ancient and historical artifacts and are sold
for educational and entertainment purposes only. |
||||